Regulatory Context

← Return to FAQ
  • Is rmForge output suitable for a submission?

    Final acceptance depends on the user-manufacturer's risk management process, the design history file, and Quality Management System (QMS). rmForge does not guarantee submission acceptance. rmForge explicitly states that qualified cross functional review and approval per a QMS-based risk management process is required by the user-manufacturer. rmForge does not accept responsibility for the content of a file or submission in any form.

  • Does rmForge align with ISO 14971?

    Yes, we endeavor to align with ISO 14971. Our internal specifications are written in harmony with ISO 14971 and ISO TR 24971.

  • Does rmForge handle IEC 60601-1 Essential Performance?

    Yes for ME devices. The Essential Performance agent implements a structured preparation and assessment sequence aligned with IEC 60601-1.

  • Does rmForge handle IEC 62366-1 usability?

    rmForge tags Intended, Misuse, and Abuse category hazards and surfaces use-related risk rows.

  • Does rmForge handle IEC 62304 software lifecycle?

    No. IEC 62304 covers software lifecycle processes (software safety classification, architecture, unit verification, integration, system testing). rmForge's HA does not produce a 62304 file. However, rmForge includes IEC 62304 requirement for Class C software to be held the maximum P1 probability of occurrence.

  • Does rmForge handle ISO 10993 biocompatibility?

    rmForge surfaces biological and chemical hazards in the HA. A full ISO 10993-1 biological evaluation plan and testing report is out of scope.

  • Does rmForge produce a Risk Management Report?

    No.

  • Does rmForge handle post-market surveillance?

    No.

  • Can I use rmForge for veterinary or non-human devices?

    rmForge's rules are anchored to human medical devices under ISO 14971. Veterinary use is not validated. Industrial or research-only devices are out of scope for now.